Anthropic Application: Member of Staff — AI & Rule of Law

Damien Riehl — application for Member of Staff, AI & Rule of Law at Anthropic

40 years coding.
15 years practicing law.
10 years building legal AI.
A career scaling human values.

— Goal: “legal by design” + “ethical by design.”

Damien Riehl

For 25+ years I’ve worked for and with courts, software code, legal code, and the rule of law: Before building legal technology, I clerked for two chief judges (state appellate, federal district), worked as a complex-litigation lawyer and a cybersecurity lead, and architected the legal-data standards and (deterministic) knowledge graphs that make legal AI verifiable. The four responsibilities in this posting closely track work I’ve been doing, in public, for years — and I’d be honored to bring it to Anthropic’s mission, and to keep learning the alignment problem from within.

Legal-alignment evals Institutional vulnerability Frontier legal issues Bolstering democracy
Portrait of Damien Riehl

Rule of Law · why it matters now

The rule of law keeps democracies alive — and as AI agents perform more of the world's work, what we do next will set the stage, for better or worse.

The stakes couldn't be higher, and the time is now. Agents can run laissez-faire, anything-goes — or be constrained by rules: by law, and by the ethics of those they serve. AI can concentrate power, or hold it accountable; the rule of law decides which. We must not squander this moment.

This is an area where I can help Anthropic — helping build AI that's legal by design. For 25 years I've made law something people, and now machines, can rely on: from the bench and the bar to the open standard (SALI/FOLIO) that makes law computable. As the rule of law has come under strain, I've drafted an open letter supporting the rule of law, which 650+ professionals signed.

“Democracies legitimate power by process, principles, and accountability.”from the open letter I organized — 650+ signers

The arc — legal practice → legal tech → policy & human values

  1. ~2002–2017Legal Practice

    Fifteen years of litigation — clerking for two chief judges, then complex litigation, cybersecurity, and digital forensics with world-leading companies.

  2. 2015–presentLegal Tech

    Ten years building AI for the law — from Thomson Reuters to Clio, architecting the SALI/FOLIO open-source legal standards, building legal tools (e.g., Vincent), and a named inventor on two patents for legal-workflow and litigation-data systems.

  3. throughoutPolicy, Access to Justice & Human Values

    A career using my legal and technical skill sets for access to justice — bar leadership, court and government councils, and coalitions that help society and humans flourish.

18,000+Legal tags authored (SALI · FOLIO)
110Countries of law being tagged
650+Signed my rule-of-law letter that I organized
2025A U.S. federal court cited me — legal AI done right

Four responsibilities · four pillars

Anthropic's posted position names four responsibilities. Each numbered section below is mapped to what I've been building for 25 years.

01 ⁄ 04

AI safety evaluations · a legal-alignment lens

“…developing frameworks to assess whether frontier AI systems behave consistently with constitutional norms, due process, and rule-of-law principles.”

Law is one of our richest computable records of human values — and I built the open standard (and knowledge graph) that makes it legible to machines.

After working for the world's largest legal-technology company, Thomson Reuters — used by the world's largest firms and corporations — I drew on that experience to lead SALI, the nonprofit legal-data standard, for five years: growing it from ~1,000 tags to 18,000+ and assembling a coalition of the world's largest law firms, the largest legal-tech companies, and the largest corporations (Microsoft among them) to standardize the metadata that classifies everything that matters to the business of law and the practice of law — worldwide (e.g., UK, EU, India, South America, APAC).

SALI and FOLIO make a hard question computable: what does the law actually require, permit, and forbid? They track human values through the lens of legal values: “do not murder” and “do not steal” are at once ethical, moral, and legal — and Murder and Theft sit among the 18,000 tags, in a knowledge graph of legal and normative human values.

The “legal oracle” — where this could serve Anthropic’s mission

  • A capable agent acting across jurisdictions will routinely brush against the law — and each law encodes a jurisdiction’s human values. So aligning AI to human values includes aligning it to human laws.
  • For years, I've been building the missing piece: tag all the law (e.g., EU law, Texas law) into a deterministic, computable knowledge graph of legal rights, obligations, prohibitions, and other deontic specifications.
  • An agent can then traverse that graph as a “legal oracle” — in real time, on CPUs, not GPUs — to check whether a contemplated action would violate the law (and thus the human values) of the relevant jurisdiction. EU values differ from Texas values; SALI/FOLIO normalize them all, with a Venn of shared vs. outlier values.
  • And beyond law, into ethics: we're extending the same machinery to faith traditions — tagging Christian (e.g., the Catholic Semantic Canon), Jewish, and Sharia texts.

Tools I've built with Claude — all free, all open source

  • FOLIO Enrich — classifies every legal document and its contents into a knowledge graph (the way Google maps things, Meta maps social, Amazon maps products) — for everything that matters to the substantive law and the business of law, worldwide.
  • FOLIO Mapper — maps any organization's existing taxonomy (law firms, corporate legal departments, governments) onto SALI/FOLIO, the comprehensive standard I built.
  • OntoKit — lets anyone improve and expand ontologies and knowledge graphs: FOLIO (the legal standard) and the Catholic Semantic Canon (an ethical/moral standard built on FOLIO).

02 ⁄ 04

Institutional vulnerability analysis

“…identifying where AI creates novel pressure points in democratic governance, and proposing both policy and technical mitigations.”

Legal by design — because the alternative can break democracy.

When a Stanford professor's expert declaration was caught citing AI-hallucinated cases, a federal court struck it — and quoted my writing on how to do legal AI correctly.

“AI, in many ways, has the potential to revolutionize legal practice for the better. See Damien Riehl …”
Kohls v. Ellison, Case No. 24-cv-3754 (LMP/DLM) (D. Minn. Jan. 10, 2025)

When the rule of law itself came under strain, I organized an open letter supporting the rule of law, signed by more than 650 legal professionals — which Robert Ambrogi covered as the profession moving for change. The Financial Times has recognized my rule-of-law work: I've been selected for the FT Law 50 (2026, to be announced this June in London).

My work has helped systems be legal by design — following both governmental law and ethical and moral principles. Built in this way, systems can do enormous good; built in other ways (e.g., imbued with hidden or nefarious principles) systems can eviscerate democracy. As both a litigator and a systems builder, I can help build the technical systems and the legal systems together. Legal by design. Preventive law.

03 ⁄ 04

Novel legal issues in frontier AI

“…mapping the unsettled legal terrain created by capable AI systems, including questions of liability, agency, and institutional authority.”

Mapping the unsettled law of capable machines — and building in it.

My 25-year career has thrived where the law lacks settled answers — autonomous-vehicle liability and agency (a precursor to AI agents), digital first-sale and ownership, and the copyrightability of machine-made works.

Beyond merely analyzing this terrain, I'm a named inventor building in it. One of my patents (with Thomson Reuters) decomposes legal work into structured, trackable tasks across the entire matter lifecycle — the scaffolding an AI agent needs to actually perform legal work, task by task. Another of my patents (with Fastcase) turns litigation dockets into machine-readable signals that power data-driven analytics of likely case outcomes. As Anthropic’s agents act in the world, aligning them with the law — one major expression of human values — becomes unavoidable, and I’d love to help build “legal by design” systems with you.

I also work to keep the frontier open: with All the Music, my team brute-forced every melody that can exist — all 471 billion — and released them to the public domain (CC0) to defuse “you stole my melody” suits. With All The Patents, I'm applying the same “open the commons” idea to patents.

04 ⁄ 04

Applications that bolster democratic processes

“…developing or identifying ways AI could strengthen civic participation, legislative capacity, or judicial function.”

My entire career has bolstered democracy — by scaling justice (human values).

The through-line of everything above is access to justice. I build coalitions (SALI, FOLIO, rule of law) and serve legal-aid organizations worldwide. And I work directly with the highest courts — the Colorado Supreme Court, the Arizona Supreme Court and Maricopa County (the nation's third-busiest trial court), and Louisiana's appellate courts — helping them work through using AI to better deliver justice, plus consult on bar reform in Washington and Indiana.

In my current role at Clio I help build Vincent across a 110+-country, one-billion-legal-document dataset — and that same experience can help Anthropic's products and services further access to justice. Justice must be scaled — and I can help Anthropic scale it.

Ethical-by-design

Law is a primary expression of human values. Ethics and faith are another.

Aligning AI with human values can't stop at statutes. I convened with Catholic leaders at the Vatican — working on systems to help society and people of faith as AI reshapes the world; I help lead — as a volunteer — the Catholic Digital Commons Foundation — free, open-source tools that widen access for communities worldwide — and the Catholic Semantic Canon, an ethical and moral standard built on the same FOLIO machinery, so a model can reason over moral values as rigorously as legal ones. Ethical-by-design — not by afterthought.

The Anthropic connection

Instead of studying frontier AI from the outside, I build on it.

The Institute sits inside a frontier lab — studying AI from within — my ideal way to work: I build legal tools with Claude, and I evaluate their lawful behavior against ground-truth legal standards I helped author. Beyond being a lawyer, I'm a named inventor on patents for the legal-workflow and litigation-data systems that legal AI is built upon. I hope to help nudge society toward human flourishing — and to help build the tools, with you.

“We don't just study AI from the outside. We study it from within.” — I've been building from within for decades.

Selected writing & scholarship

A published body of work on law, technology & the rule of law.

Books

Three West Academic books on litigation practice — each with an AI-interactive QR-code layer.

Articles

Two decades of legal scholarship — in law reviews, legal journals, and legal publications — all discussing how technology is transforming the law (and society).

  1. 2026

    Beyond the Chatbot: Meet the Agentic Law Firm ↗

    Bench & Bar of Minn. (May/June 2026)

  2. 2024
  3. 2024

    AI + MSBA: Building Minnesota's Legal Future ↗

    81-Oct. Bench & Bar of Minn. 26 (2024)Open access

    Cited by the U.S. District Court in Kohls v. Ellison, Case No. 24-cv-3754 (LMP/DLM) (D. Minn. Jan. 10, 2025). Winner, MSBA Elmer H. Wiblishauser Author's Award.

  4. 2024
  5. 2024

    Evolution of the Data-Driven Lawyer ↗

    20 U. St. Thomas L.J. 368 (2024)Open access

  6. 2023
  7. 2023

    Standardizing Legal Data to Extract Insights ↗

    AALL Spectrum, May/June 2023 (Vol. 27, No. 5)

  8. 2016–18

    Car Minus Driver: Autonomous Vehicles Driving Regulation, Liability, and Policy ↗

    Bench & Bar of Minn. (2016); 73 J. Mo. B. 264 (2017) (Parts I & II); The Computer & Internet Lawyer (2018)

    Published in three journals

  9. 2016

    Writing Briefs for Judges Who Read on Screens ↗

    Lee Marshall & Damien Riehl

    JD Supra (Mar. 9, 2016)

  10. You Can't Judge an ECF Notice by its Cover ↗

    Robins Kaplan "Briefly" / Minn. Law.

  11. 2014

    Screen Writing for Screen Reading ↗

    Eric J. Magnuson & Damien Riehl

    Minnesota Lawyer (Apr. 17, 2014) · Robins Kaplan "Briefly"

  12. Sensors, Wearables, and Liability: The Brave New World of IoT

    Minnesota Lawyer (print)Print only

  13. 2014

    Is "Buying" Digital Content Just "Renting" for Life? Contemplating a Digital First-Sale Doctrine ↗

    Damien A. Riehl & Jumi Kassim

    40 Wm. Mitchell L. Rev. 783 (2014)Open access

  14. 2014

    The Digital Death Conundrum: How Federal and State Laws Prevent Fiduciaries from Managing Digital Property ↗

    Christina L. Kunz, Damien A. Riehl, James D. Lamm & Peter J. Rademacher

    68 U. Miami L. Rev. 385 (2014)Open access

  15. 2012

    Forensic Collection of Electronic Evidence from Infrastructure-as-a-Service Cloud Computing ↗

    Josiah Dykstra & Damien Riehl

    19 Rich. J.L. & Tech. 1 (2012)Open access

  16. 2001

    Peer-to-Peer Distribution Systems: Will Napster, Gnutella, and Freenet Create a Copyright Nirvana or Gehenna? ↗

    27 Wm. Mitchell L. Rev. 1761 (2001)Open access

    Student note — Damien was Executive Editor of the William Mitchell Law Review.

In the press

Coverage and interviews about Damien — not authored by him.

Communicating the work · in service

For this work to matter, it has to be understood.

A large part of this role is communication — helping courts, bar leaders, and the public understand how AI is reshaping the law, and what responsible adoption looks like. Since ChatGPT’s debut, I’ve given more than 200 talks — most of them solo keynotes — to the people who run the legal system. My aim in each is the same: take a complex, fast-moving subject and make it simple and usable, so the audience can decide well. That same skill would help carry Anthropic’s findings — and its values — to the institutions that most need to hear them.

  • 2026 · plenaryState Bar of Texas — Annual Conference plenary keynote (3,000+ attendees).
  • American Bar AssociationABA TECHSHOW (ethics), ABA + National Conference of Bar Presidents, and ABA regulatory-reform programs.
  • The judiciaryThe U.S. federal judiciary (its national IT Advisory Council), the federal courts in Minnesota, and the statewide judicial conferences of Arizona, Minnesota & Nevada.
  • State barsKeynotes to the bars of Florida, Minnesota, Arizona, Louisiana, Oklahoma & Oregon.
  • The profession’s leadersPartner retreats & executive boards at AmLaw 100 firms; AI & law at Stanford Law.
  • Public audienceTEDx speaker — full speaking record ↗

Recognition

Recognized at the law–AI frontier.

The full record

Two decades, in detail.

The pillars above map the highlights to the role. The full chronological CV — every clerkship, role, board, and appointment — lives on one page.